Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Bond v. Moore

Superior Court of Delaware

July 10, 2019

LYNEZ BOND, Appellants,
v.
SHONEIKA MOORE, Appellee.

          Submitted: June 26, 2019

          On Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas:

          Lynez Bond, pro se, Appellant.

          Shoneika Moore, pro se, Appellee.

          ORDER

          FERRIS W. WHARTON, J.

         This 10 day of July, 2019, upon consideration of Appellant Lynez Bond's ("Bond") Opening Brief, [1] the Amended Answering Brief of Appellee Shoneika Moore ("Moore"), [2] Bond's Reply Brief, [3] and the record, [4] it appears to the Court that:

         1. The underlying complaint in this appeal was for defamation and libel. At trial in the Court of Common Pleas, as on appeal in this Court, both parties appeared pro se. After trial, Judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff Moore and against defendant Bond for $10, 050.00 with pre and post judgment interest and costs. This appeal followed.

         2. Bond lists four reasons why the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas should be reversed. They are set out below, which is also the entirety of his opening brief:

(1) The judge asked me what did you mean by your statement in the PFA saying "broke on my neck several time" I explained to the Judge I meant necklace; his reply was, No, you said Ms. Moore broke your neck; I did not say Ms. Moore broke my neck but the judge made his ruling on that alone!
(2) Ms. Moore has no evidence I caused her to miss her business trip, scheduled for 06/14/15 and 16th of 2018 she missed her trip because she filed a petition for child support, hearing date 06/18/18. Case #18-04101.
(3) Ms. Moore claims I called her Job as a DFS worker and I jeopardized her employment with no evidence to prove it! Ms. Moore claims I am the reason she was demoted from full to part time but yet presented as evidence in court on 2/11/19 her employer at the time (Harvest Christian academy) says due to Ms. Moore having only four (4) student in her daycare classroom they could no longer accommodate her full-time position.
(4) Judge said I was the reason for her being treated like a criminal! My PFA was ordered on 1/30/18 Ms. Moore was not arrested until a Maryland peace order, I had nothing to do with, for Harrassment by my fiance, hazel Hart, was transferred to a PFA on 07/10/18. Case#18-19596[5]

         3. Moore disputes each of Bond's four points. As to the first three, she argues that the trial judge had all of the information before him and drew his own conclusions from the record evidence and exhibits.[6] As to the fourth, she reargues and expands upon factual issues contested at trial.[7]

         4. In reply, Bond again asserts that the trial judge was wrong to base his decision on a statement in the PFA complaint Bond brought against Moore in which he claimed that Moore broke his neck several times. Bond claims he meant to say that Moore broke his necklace, not his neck. Bond also introduces for the first time allegations of Moore's bad character that ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.