Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Gore v. Al Jazeera America Holdings I Inc

Court of Chancery of Delaware

February 19, 2015

Gore
v.
Al Jazeera America Holdings I, Inc.,

Submitted: February 9, 2015

Dear Counsel:

I have received the Plaintiffs' Motion for Clarification Pursuant to Court of Chancery Rule 59(f), requesting clarification of the "alternative ruling" in my bench ruling of February 3, 2015, together with the Defendant's response. Because I believe that additional guidance is warranted, I will clarify that portion of the ruling.[1] My statements regarding how the Merger Agreement appears to allocate the burden of proof for indemnification claims were limited to resolution of the Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings under Court of Chancery Rule 12(c); these statements are not a holding on the meaning of any portion of the Merger Agreement and do not preclude any party from arguing issues of contract interpretation, including the evidentiary burden that will apply at trial, in the future. To the extent the foregoing requires an Order to take effect, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Sincerely,

Sam Glasscock III


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.