Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Murray v. Lancaster Court Rental, LLC

Superior Court of Delaware, New Castle

February 12, 2015

EDWARD MURRAY, Appellant/Defendant-Below,
v.
LANCASTER COURT RENTAL, LLC, Appellee/Plaintiff-Below.

Submitted: February 11, 2015

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S EMERGENCY MOTION FOR STAY OF EVICTION

HONORABLE ANDREA L. ROCANELLI

Upon Defendant/Appellant's motion for a stay of eviction submitted February 11, 2015, the Court finds as follows:

1. This is a summary possession case filed by Plaintiff, Lancaster Court Rentals, against Defendant, Edward Murray, in Justice of the Peace Court Number 13.[1]
2. Trial was scheduled in the Justice of the Peace Court on November 18, 2014. Defendant did not appear for trial and default judgment was entered against Defendant. A writ of possession was issued.
3. The proper procedure to appeal a writ of possession as a matter of right requires an appellant to request a trial before a three-judge Justice of the Peace panel pursuant to 25 Del. C. § 5717(a).[2] The statutory framework under Title 25, Section 57 of the Delaware Code provides no right to appeal from a decision of the three-judge panel.
4. Here, Defendant did not follow this procedure to appeal the writ of possession. Instead, Defendant filed a motion to vacate the default judgment with the Justice of the Peace Court. Defendant's motion to vacate claimed Defendant failed to appear at the November 18th trial because he was involved in a motor vehicle accident.
5. On December 18, 2014, the Justice of the Peace Court held a hearing on Defendant's motion to vacate default judgment. The Justice of the Peace Court determined Defendant lacked credibility and that Defendant offered no documentary evidence of the alleged accident through insurance information or otherwise. Accordingly, by Order dated December 23, 2014, the Justice of the Peace Court denied Defendant's motion to vacate the default judgment.[3]
6. Defendant then appealed the Justice of the Peace Court's Order denying Defendant's motion to vacate default judgment to the Court of Common Pleas.
7. On January 30, 2015, the Court of Common Pleas issued an Order finding that the Justice of the Peace Court did not abuse its discretion in denying Defendant's motion to vacate default judgment.[4] The Court of Common Pleas affirmed the Justice of the Peace Court's decision and remanded the case back to the Justice of the Peace Court.
8. On February 2, 2015, Defendant filed a notice of appeal from the decision of the Court of Common Pleas with the Superior Court.
9. In the meantime, on February 9, 2015, upon remand, the Justice of the Peace Court issued an eviction notice on the grounds that Defendant did not appeal the writ of possession.
10. As noted previously, a writ of possession may only be appealed to a three-judge panel. Defendant did not properly appeal the writ of possession pursuant to 25 Del. C. § 5717.[5]
11. Defendant did not appeal the eviction notice. Defendant's only option, upon following the appellate procedure, would have been to file a writ of certiorari with this Court because this Court has the original and exclusive jurisdiction to issue writs of certiorari to the Justice of the Peace Court in summary possession cases.[6] Instead, on February 11, 2015, Defendant filed the pending emergency motion for stay of eviction with this Court.
12. This Court does not have subject matter jurisdiction to stay the eviction.
13. Even if Defendant had followed the appropriate appellate procedure, Defendant would still be without a right to appeal the summary possession decision and accompanying issues to this Court.[7]
14. Furthermore, even if Defendant filed a proper writ of certiorari with this Court, Defendant's appeal has no merit because there are no errors on the face of the record.[8] This Court cannot accommodate Defendant's request to stay a properly executed eviction notice because this Court lacks jurisdiction and to do so would be an improper act, functionally equivalent to a traditional appellate review.[9]

NOW, THEREFORE, upon this 12th day of February 2015, Defendant's emergency motion for stay of eviction is hereby DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.