Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In re TransPerfect Global, Inc.

Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle

December 3, 2014

In re TransPerfect Global, Inc.

Submitted: November 18, 2014

Kevin R. Shannon, Esquire Berton W. Ashman, Jr., Esquire Christopher N. Kelly, Esquire Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP

Kurt M. Heyman, Esquire Melissa N. Donimirsky, Esquire Proctor Heyman LLP

Gregory P. Williams, Esquire Lisa A. Schmidt, Esquire Robert L. Burns, Esquire Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.

Susan Wood Waesco, Esquire Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell LLP

Andre G. Bouchard Chancellor

Dear Counsel:

On November 18, 2014, I took under advisement after oral argument the motion of plaintiff Elizabeth Elting ("Elting") for the appointment of a temporary custodian "with authority to resolve deadlocks relating to the management of the business and affairs of TransPerfect Global, Inc. ["TPG" or the "Company"] and its wholly owned subsidiaries . . . pending the disposition of the parties' claims in Civil Action Nos. 9686-CB and 9700-CB." A trial in those actions has been scheduled on an expedited basis to begin on February 23, 2015, to resolve, among other things, Elting's petition for the appointment of a custodian under 8 Del. C. § 226(a)(2).

As discussed below, although Elting's motion raises a number of issues that may warrant the appointment of a custodian after trial, I do not believe based on the present record that a temporary custodian is urgently needed for the immediate protection of TPG during the relatively short period of time before a trial will be held in this action. For that reason, Elting's motion for the appointment of a temporary custodian is denied.

1. Legal Standard

Section 226(a)(2) of the Delaware General Corporation Law provides for the appointment of a custodian to resolve a deadlock when:

The business of the corporation is suffering or is threatened with irreparable injury because the directors are so divided respecting the management of the affairs of the corporation that the required vote for action by the board of directors cannot be obtained and the stockholders are unable to terminate this division . . . . 8 Del. C. § 226(a)(2).

Elting acknowledges that, because she seeks the appointment of an interim custodian until a trial can be held, she also must demonstrate that the "appointment is urgently needed for the immediate protection of the corporation." Moore v. C.H.M. ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.