Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Simpson v. Stark

Supreme Court of Delaware

August 27, 2014

DANIEL D. SIMPSON, [1] Petitioner Below-Appellant,
v.
HANNAH STARK, Respondent Below-Appellee

Submitted July 25, 2014

Case Closed September 12, 2014.

Editorial Note:

This decision has been designated as "Table of Decisions Without Published Opinions." in the Atlantic Reporter.

Court Below--Family Court of the State of Delaware, in and for Sussex County. File No. CS07-02817. Petition No. 13-1882.

Before HOLLAND, RIDGELY and VALIHURA, Justices.

ORDER

Randy J. Holland, Justice

This 27th day of August 2014, upon consideration of the parties' briefs and the record below, it appears to the Court that:

(1) The appellant, Daniel D. Simpson (" the Father" ), filed this appeal from the Family Court's January 27, 2014 order granting the Father and the appellee, Hannah Stark (" the Mother" ), joint legal custody and shared physical placement of their minor daughters. We find no error or abuse of discretion in the Family Court's decision. Accordingly, we affirm the decision of the Family Court.

(2) The parties are the parents of a daughter born on May 4, 2007 and a daughter born on December 7, 2008 (collectively, " the Children" ). After the parents ended their relationship, they alternated placement of the Children based upon their work schedules. On May 2, 2013, the Father filed a petition for primary custody of the Children. The Mother filed a cross-petition for primary custody of the Children.

(3) The Family Court held a hearing on the petitions on January 27, 2014. The Father was represented by counsel, while the Mother appeared pro se. The Father presented five witnesses including himself, a daycare operator, the daycare operator's daughter, a hairdresser who was a friend of the Father, and his mother. The Mother presented two witnesses, including herself and her mother. The Family Court also interviewed the Children. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Family Court reviewed the best interest factors set forth in 13 Del C. § 722 and the evidence regarding each factor. The Family Court concluded that none of the factors favored one parent over the other and ordered that the parents share joint legal custody of the Children and residential placement of the Children on a week on, week off basis. The Family Court entered an order reflecting its rulings at the January 27th hearing. The Father filed this appeal.

(4) On appeal, the Father contends that: (i) he provides a more stable environment for the Children because he has been at the same address for six years and the Mother has resided at several different places and is currently staying at a motel; (ii) he has no criminal history and the Mother has a criminal history; (iii) the Mother has been accused of using drugs and did not take a drug test as requested in the proceedings below; (iv) he has been steadily employed and the Mother only works part-time; (v) multiple witnesses testified at the January 27, 2014 hearing that they did not believe the Mother was caring for the Children as well as she had previously; and (vi) the parties' older daughter is missing too much school while staying with the Mother. In her answering brief, the Mother disputes the Father's claims and contends that the Father upsets the Children by verbally abusing her.

(5) This Court's review of a Family Court decision includes a review of both the law and the facts.[2] Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo.[3] Factual findings will not be disturbed on appeal unless they are clearly erroneous.[4] We will not substitute our opinion for the inferences and deductions of the trial judge if those inferences are supported by the record.[5]

(6) Under Delaware law, the Family Court is required to determine legal custody and residential arrangements for a child in accordance with the best interests of the child.[6] The criteria for determining the best interests of a child are set forth in 13 Del C. ยง 722. Under Section 722, the Family Court must consider all relevant factors including: (i) the wishes of the parents regarding the child's custody and residential arrangements; (ii) the wishes of the child regarding her custodians and residential arrangements; (iii) the interaction and interrelationship of the child with her parents, grandparents, siblings, persons cohabitating in the relationship of husband and wife with a parent of the child, and any other residents of the household or persons who may significantly affect the child's best interests; (iv) the child's adjustment to her home, school, and community; (v) the mental and physical health of all individuals involved; ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.