Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Jordan v. Indian River School District

Superior Court of Delaware, Sussex

August 12, 2014

Maureen Jordan and Nina Jordan, a minor, by and through Maureen Jordan, Guardian Ad Litem and Next Friend
v.
Indian River School District and Lisa A. McVey

Date Submitted: August 12, 2014

Craig A. Karsnitz, Esquire Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP

Brian L. Kasprzak, Esquire Marc Sposato, Esquire Marks, O’Neil, O’Brien, Doherty & Kelley, P.C.

Dear Counsel:

The Defendants' Motion for Reargument pursuant to Superior Court Civil Rule 59(e) is DENIED. Neither the law nor the facts have been misunderstood; the reargument is simply re-litigating a previously rejected argument that is not appropriate at this juncture.[1]

Cases of this type presented here are fact intensive. Negligence with a ministerial act or gross negligence with a discretionary act may give rise to responsibility. The Complaint is sufficient for the litigation to proceed normally. Once a fully developed record is made, the subject may be revisited, if indicated, through summary judgment.

Very truly yours,

Richard F. Stokes


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.