Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Magnetar Techs. Corp. v. Six Flags theme Parks, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Delaware

July 29, 2014

MAGNETAR TECHNOLOGIES CORP., ET AL., Plaintiffs,
v.
SIX FLAGS THEME PARKS, INC., ET AL., Defendants

Page 438

For Magnetar Technologies Corp., a Nevada Corporation, Plaintiff: Steven J. Balick, LEAD ATTORNEY, Tiffany Geyer Lydon, Ashby & Geddes, Wilmington, DE; Joseph Hosteny, PRO HAC VICE; Patrick F. Solon, PRO HAC VICE.

For G& T Conveyor Co., a Florida Corporation, Plaintiff: Steven J. Balick, LEAD ATTORNEY, Tiffany Geyer Lydon, Ashby & Geddes, Wilmington, DE.

For Geoffrey Zelley, Petitioner: Keith A. Walter, Jr., LEAD ATTORNEY, Novak Druce Connolly Bove Quigg LLP, Wilmington, DE.

For Six Flags Theme Parks Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Tierco Maryland Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Busch Entertainment Corp., a Delaware Corporation, Cedar Fair LP, a Delaware limited partnership, Paramount Parks Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Great America LLC, an Illinois company, KKI, LLC, a Delaware company, Magic Mountain, LLC, a California company, Park Management Corp., a California corporation, Riverside Park Enterprises, Inc., a Massachusets company, Six Flags Over Georgia II, L.P., a Delaware partnership, Six Flags St. Louis, LLC, a Missouri company, Texas Flags, LTD, a Texas partnership, Darien Lake Theme Park and Camping Resort, Inc., a New York corporation, Elitch Gardens, L.P., a Colorado partnership, Knott's Berry Farm, a California partnership, Kings Island Company, a Delaware corporation, Cedar Fair, an Ohio partnership, Defendants: Sean T. O'Kelly, O'Kelly, Ernst, & Bielli, LLC, Wilmington, DE.

For Astroworld, L.P., a Delaware partnership, Defendant: Aaron W. Moore, PRO HAC VICE; Matthew B Lowrie, PRO HAC VICE; Sean T. O'Kelly, O'Kelly, Ernst, & Bielli, LLC, Wilmington, DE.

For Tierco Maryland Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Blackstone Group LP, a Delaware limited partnership, Six Flags Theme Parks Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Tierco Maryland Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Great America LLC, an Illinois company, KKI, LLC, a Delaware company, Magic Mountain, LLC, a California company, Park Management Corp., a California corporation, Riverside Park Enterprises, Inc., a Massachusets company, Six Flags Over Georgia II, L.P., a Delaware partnership, Six Flags St. Louis, LLC, a Missouri company, Texas Flags, LTD, a Texas partnership, Astroworld, L.P., a Delaware partnership, Darien Lake Theme Park and Camping Resort, Inc., a New York corporation, Elitch Gardens, L.P., a Colorado partnership, Six Flags Theme Parks Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Counter Claimants: Sean T. O'Kelly, O'Kelly, Ernst, & Bielli, LLC, Wilmington, DE.

For Cedar Fair LP, a Delaware limited partnership, Paramount Parks Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Busch Entertainment Corp., a Delaware Corporation, Cedar Fair LP, a Delaware limited partnership, Paramount Parks Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Knott's Berry Farm, a California partnership, Kings Island Company, a Delaware corporation, Cedar Fair, an Ohio partnership, Counter Claimants: Sean T. O'Kelly, LEAD ATTORNEY, O'Kelly, Ernst, & Bielli, LLC, Wilmington, DE.

Page 439

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Leonard P. Stark, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Reports and Recommendations issued by Chief Magistrate Judge Mary Pat Thynge (D.I. 404,405, 407) (" Reports" ) are ADOPTED and Plaintiffs' objections to those Reports (D.I. 409, 410, 411) are OVERRULED.

2. Defendants' Motion to Exclude Plaintiffs' Infringement Expert, Mark T. Hanlon, (D.I. 343) is GRANTED.

3. Defendants' Motion to Exclude Plaintiffs' Lay Witness, Edward Pribonic, (D.I. 341) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.

4. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity of the '125 Patent (D.I. 337) is GRANTED.

5. Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment of Infringement of Claim 3 of the '125 Patent (D.I. 327) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.

6. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of Claim 3 of '125 Patent (D.I. 339) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.

7. Defendants' Motion of Invalidity and Non-Infringement of '237 Patent (D.I. 333) is DENIED as to invalidity and ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.