Submitted: July 3, 2013
Corrected: August 14, 2013
Upon Defendant’s Motion for Costs DENIED.
Thomas C. Crumplar, Esquire, Jacobs & Crumplar, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware, Attorney for Plaintiff.
Stephen P. Casarino, Esquire, Casarino, Christman, Shalk, Ransom, & Doss, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware, Attorney for Defendant.
PAUL R. WALLACE, JUDGE
From June 10 to 14, 2014, this Court heard the above-captioned Child Victim Act ("CVA") action. On June 14, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the Defendant, Reverend Edwin Kang. On June 24, 2013, Rev. Kang moved this Court to assess costs against Plaintiff, Winifred Sammons. For the reasons stated below, Rev. Kang's motion is DENIED.
II. Factual and Procedural Background
In 2007, the Delaware Legislature passed the CVA in response to revelations of decades of unreported, yet credible accusations of child sexual abuse that had escaped prosecution. By its terms, the CVA both eliminated any statute of limitations for civil actions arising from future acts of sexual abuse of a child by an adult,  and permitted, for a period of two years following July 9, 2007, victims of child sexual abuse who would be barred by the former statute of limitations to bring their cases in this Court. Ms. Sammons filed a Complaint claiming that in the late 1960s, when she was between the ages of 16 and 18, she was sexually abused by Rev. Kang, who at the time was a minister at Minquadale United Methodist Church ("Minquadale UMC"). Ms. Sammons was a member of Minquadale UMC's youth group and alleged that Rev. Kang sexually abused her in the church rectory, where he lived. When she was eighteen years old, Ms. Sammons gave birth to Rev. Kang's son.
At trial, Rev. Kang did not dispute he had sexual contact with Ms. Sammons; rather, he claimed the sexual contact between himself and Ms. Sammons occurred just once, at her insistence, and not until after her eighteenth birthday. In his defense, Rev. Kang called Dr. Gordon Ostrum who opined that the date of conception of Ms. Sammons' and Rev. Kang's son likely occurred just after her eighteenth birthday. Rev. Kang also called Diane Tait, a licensed clinical social worker who had counseled Ms. Sammons in the 1990s. Ms. Tait read from her treatment notes and recounted her therapeutic conversations with Ms. Sammons, testifying that Ms. Sammons never discussed the abuse she now alleged by Rev. Kang.
Following trial and a jury verdict in favor of Rev. Kang, he filed a Motion for Costs, which Ms. Sammons opposes. Pursuant to 10 Del. C. § 5101 and this Court's Civil Rule 54(d), Rev. Kang requests the following costs:
Trial Testimony of Ms. Tait: ...