Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION </h1> <p class="docCourt"> </p> <p> July 11, 1997 </p> <p class="case-parties"> <b>NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION, PETITIONER<br><br>v.<br><br>FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, RESPONDENT<br><br>INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS OF NEW YORK, INC., ET AL., INTERVENORS<br><br>CONSOLIDATED WITH NOS. 95-1223, 95-1298, 95-1299, 95-1302, 95-1303, 95-1309</b><br><br> </p> <div class="caseCopy"> <div class="facLeaderBoard"> <script type="text/javascript"><!-- google_ad_client = "ca-pub-1233285632737842"; /* FACLeaderBoard */ google_ad_slot = "8524463142"; google_ad_width = 728; google_ad_height = 90; //--> </script> <script type="text/javascript" src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js"> </script> </div class="facLeaderBoard"> <div class="numbered-paragraph"><p><br> Before: Silberman, Ginsburg, and Sentelle, Circuit Judges.</p></div> <div class="numbered-paragraph"><p> Ginsburg, Circuit Judge</p></div> <div class="numbered-paragraph"><p> FOR PUBLICATION</p></div> <div class="numbered-paragraph"><p> FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT</p></div> <div class="numbered-paragraph"><p> Argued December 2, 1996</p></div> <div class="numbered-paragraph"><p> On Petitions for Review of Orders of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission</p></div> <div class="numbered-paragraph"><p> Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge Ginsburg.</p></div> <div class="numbered-paragraph"><p> Petitioners seek review of two declaratory orders of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission interpreting the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA), 16 U.S.C. Section(s) 824a-3. Because the two orders do nothing more than set out the position that the Commission would take in an enforcement action before the district court, we are without jurisdiction to review them.</p></div> <div class="numbered-paragraph"><p> I. Background</p></div> <div class="facAdFloatLeft"> <script type="text/javascript"><!-- google_ad_client = "ca-pub-1233285632737842"; /* FACContentLeftSkyscraperWide */ google_ad_slot = "1266897617"; google_ad_width = 160; google_ad_height = 600; //--> </script> <script type="text/javascript" src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js"></script> </div class="facLeaderBoard"> <div class="numbered-paragraph"><p> In June 1987 the Southeastern Connecticut Regional Resources Recovery Authority, a political subdivision of the State of Connecticut chartered to dispose of municipal waste, petitioned the Connecticut Department of Utility Control (CDUC) for a declaration that Section(s) 16-243e of the Connecticut General Statutes required the Connecticut Light and Power Company (CL&P) to purchase electricity from a cogeneration facility operated by the Authority at the rate the utility charges a municipality for electricity. The CDUC ordered CL&P to pay the municipal rate, as the statute clearly commands.</p></div> <div class="numbered-paragraph"><p> CL&P appealed this decision to the Supreme Court of Connecticut, arguing that the PURPA preempts Section(s) 16-243e, at least insofar as the Connecticut statute would require a utility to pay more for electricity than its avoided cost. The Court held that the CDUC had misapplied Section(s) 16-243e and remanded the matter for the agency to recalculate the rate. Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Department of Public Utility Control, <a>554 A.2d 1089</a> (1989). The Court did not address CL&P's claim of preemption.</p></div> <div class="numbered-paragraph"><p> Believing that the rate calculated by the CDUC on remand still exceeded its avoided cost, CL&P sued the Authority in federal district court seeking a declaratory judgment that the PURPA preempts Section(s) 16-243e. Applying the doctrine of primary jurisdiction, the district court stayed the proceeding for CL&P first to seek a declaratory ruling from the FERC. Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. South Eastern [sic] Connecticut Regional Resources Recovery Authority, 822 F. Supp. 888 (D.Conn. 1993). CL&P duly petitioned the FERC for an answer to the question: "Does federal law preempt the application of Section(s) 16-243e of the Connecticut General Statutes to CL&P either in all circumstances or as Section(s) 16-243e has been applied in the context of the resources recovery facility of the Southeastern Regional Resources Recovery Authority located in Preston, Connecticut?" Connecticut Light & Power Co., 70 FERC Para(s) 61,012 (January 11, 1995).</p></div> <div class="numbered-paragraph"><p> The Commission declared that the PURPA preempts Section(s) 16-243e. Id. Section 210(f) of the PURPA requires the Commission to ensure that the rate a utility pays to a cogenerator is no higher than the utility's avoided cost. See Section(s) 824a-3(b) ("No such rule prescribed under subsection (a) of this section shall provide for a rate which exceeds the incremental cost to the electric utility of alternative electric energy"), and 824a-3(d) (defining incremental cost); American Paper Institute Inc. v. American Electric Power, <a>461 U.S. 402</a>, 406 (1983) (PURPA and implementing regulations "requir[e] a utility to purchase electricity from a [qualified facility] at a rate equal to the utility's full avoided cost.") According to the Commission, the PURPA gives the States responsibility only for "implementing" the rules promulgated by the Commission, citing Section(s) 824a-3(f); it does not authorize the States to override or to subvert those rules, as Section(s) 16-243e would do.</p></div> <div class="numbered-paragraph"><p> The Commission also declared that it would not apply its newly-announced preemption analysis to invalidate contracts that had not previously been challenged on the ground of preemption. "The appropriate time to challenge a state-imposed rate," the Commission reasoned, "is up to or at the time the contract is signed, not several years into a contract which heretofore has been satisfactory to both parties."</p></div> <div class="numbered-paragraph"> <p> The Authority requested rehearing of the preemption issue. Niagara Mohawk also petitioned for rehearing, arguing that the Commission should apply its decision to all contracts regardless whether they had previously been challenged on the ground of preemption. The Commission denied both petitions, Connecticut Light & Power Co., 71 FERC ...</p> </div> </div> </div> <div id="caseToolTip" class="caseToolTip" style="display: none;"> <div class="toolTipHead"> </div> <div class="toolTipContent"> <p> Our website includes the first part of the main text of the court's opinion. To read the entire case, you must purchase the decision for download. With purchase, you also receive any available docket numbers, case citations or footnotes, dissents and concurrences that accompany the decision. Docket numbers and/or citations allow you to research a case further or to use a case in a legal proceeding. Footnotes (if any) include details of the court's decision. If the document contains a simple affirmation or denial without discussion, there may not be additional text. </p> </div> <div class="toolTipFoot"> </div> </div> <br /> <div class="buyNowContainer"> <div class="price"> <img src="/assets/img/findACase/bracket-left.png" alt="" /> <span>Buy This Entire Record For $7.95</span> <img src="/assets/img/findACase/pdf.png" class="pdf" alt="" /> <img src="/assets/img/findACase/bracket-right.png" alt="" /> </div> <div class="details"> <p> Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,<br /> docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case. </p> <p> <a class="showCaseToolTip">Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.</a> </p> </div> <div class="buttons"> <input type="submit" name="FAC$cphMainContent$btnBuyNowBottom" value="Buy Now" id="btnBuyNowBottom" class="btn-cart-buy-now btn btn-fac btnOrderTop" data-doc-short-name="19970711_0000172.cdc.htm" data-doc-title="<title> NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION" /> <input type="submit" name="FAC$cphMainContent$btnAddToCartBottom" value="Add To Cart" id="btnAddToCartBottom" class="btn-cart-add btn btn-fac btnOrderTop" data-doc-short-name="19970711_0000172.cdc.htm" data-doc-title="<title> NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION" /> </div> </div> <input type="hidden" name="FAC$cphMainContent$hfDocID" id="hfDocID" value="\FCT\CDC\1997\19970711_0000172.CDC.htm" /> <input type="hidden" name="FAC$cphMainContent$hfDocTitle" id="hfDocTitle" value="<title> NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION" /> <input type="hidden" name="FAC$cphMainContent$hfDocShortName" id="hfDocShortName" value="19970711_0000172.CDC.htm" /> </div> <div id="pnlGrayBarBottom" class="grayBar"> <span class="grayBarLeft"></span><span class="grayBarRight"></span> </div> <div id="footer"> <p> <a href="http://findacase.com/">Home</a> <span>/</span> <a href="http://findacase.com/our-sources.aspx"> Our Sources</a> <span>/</span> <a href="http://findacase.com/about.aspx">About Us</a> <span>/</span> <a href="http://findacase.com/faq.aspx">FAQs</a> <span>/</span> <a href="http://findacase.com/research/advanced-search.aspx">Advanced Search</a> </p> <p> copyright 2021 LRC, Inc. <a href="http://findacase.com/about.aspx">About Us</a> </p> <p> <span id="privacyPolicy"><a href="http://findacase.com/privacy-policy.aspx">PRIVACY POLICY</a></span> </p> <div id="crosslink" style="width: 100%; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.legalresearch.com/litigation-advisor/litigation-pathfinder/litigation-pathfinder-subscription-plan/"><img src="http://findacase.com/Img/ad_FACtoLitPath.jpg" alt="Litigation Pathfinder - practical legal advice and comprehensive research resources made affordable" style="width: 375px;" /></a></div> </div> </div> </form> </body> </html>