Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Winsby v. John Oster Manufacturing Co.

decided: June 28, 1973.

C. MERRITT WINSBY, APPELLANT,
v.
JOHN OSTER MANUFACTURING CO., GIMBEL BROTHERS, INC.



D.C. Civil Action No. 69-171. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania.

Biggs and Gibbons, Circuit Judges and Huyett, District Judge

Author: Per Curiam

Opinion OF THE COURT

In this products liability suit,*fn1 plaintiff was required, despite timely objection, to proceed to trial before a six-man jury per force of local Rule 21(C) of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania.*fn2 The jury returned a verdict in favor of defendants, judgment was so entered, and the court below denied plaintiff's motion for a new trial.*fn3 This appeal followed.

Plaintiff asserts that the Seventh Amendment to the Constitution, 28 U.S.C. § 2072, and F.R.Civ.P. 48 (see 28 U.S.C. § 2071 and F.R.Civ.P. 83) all prohibit reduction in the size of the 12-man jury in civil cases by means of a district court rule. The Supreme Court has, however, by its recent decision in Colgrove v. Battin, 413 U.S. 149, 93 S. Ct. 2448, 37 L. Ed. 2d 522 (1973) (filed June 21, 1973), resolved such doubts as to the propriety of a district court's unilateral reduction in the size of the 12-man jury, and plaintiff's challenge is thus foreclosed.

Plaintiff also claims that the trial court's instructions to the jury were inadequate on the theory of strict liability, § 402A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts. On review of the charge, we find no error in this regard.

The judgment of the district court will ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.